Sunday, June 08, 2008

Response to Facebook Note by my Friend Girish Varma
Original URL

Girish and Vatsil had some interesting comments on the recent fuel price hike in India, which has created a lot of tension between the Govt. and the people

Original Post:
Here is the transcript of a discussion i had with my friend, arun regarding my previous post on fuel prise hike (with his permission):

1. arun: n hey i read ur petrol blog post; u should read "Who are the common men of India" by Arjun Sengupta n others at NCEUS
2. arun: did u know that 77% of Indian population survive on less than Rs.20 per day?

3. me: ohh. all i was saying is the companies and government have their breaking point on how much they can bear. Which if get over will cause years worth of hard work {to be wasted}

4. me: 90 % of all the leader who are against price hike are totally ignoring this fact. Congress does not deserve this much ridicule

5. arun: the point is the people who are affected by price hike are around 90%; whereas those who lose out a little of their profit (not loss) is only a few thousands; the people who survive with less than 20 Rs a day (837 million or 77%) will be affected drastically; as petrol price hike increases all prices
6. arun: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3867/is_200710/ai_n21279019/pg_1

7. arun: http://www.scribd.com/doc/3262393/Indias-common-people-Who-are-they-How-Many-are-they-and-How-Do-they-live

8. me: if those few people loose out, on a long term everyone will be at a loose, as they cannot provide jobs or growth to the country.

9. arun: hehe; what use are jobs if they cant survive? read the first link

...
...

We all have to agree that [a] is true. A large percent of Indians do live on what even their fellow coutrymen would think is a small amount. The question is, what approach does the govt. adopt for their development?

The govt. can either
(1) Take matters into its own hands, run all the essential services in the public sector, and keep the economy isolated from the ups and downs in the global economy. This is what was happening right from Independence upto the beginning of the 90s. And we all know how slow the economic development of the country has been then.

(2) Allow private investment, and hope that the jobs so created and the huge amount of investment, especially from an open market system, will improve the economy, which in turn will help the impoverished, albeit only at the very end of the line. As the overall growth in the economy shows, this strategy has paid off, but the benefits of the rapidly growing economy is yet to reach the bottom layer.

In the current scenario, it is the duty of the govt, ant govt, to protect the interests of the masses and the private companies, the latter so that the investment potential of the country is not harmed. Granted, the private companies do keep their own profits in front, but they also tend to be socially conscious and provide steady and large sources of labour, if only to appease the country's govt and people who ultimately decide their future.

The Indian Govt. has clearly masked the effects of the global oil price hike from the population for as long as possible, but there has to be a breaking point. At this point, the loss of all private investment in the oil sector is simply not affordable. So, there has to a decision, even though a hard one, to set the balances right.

PS: These opinions are my personal ones. Please feel free to criticize.

3 comments:

Hari Vishnu said...

hehe this was the same view i held.. until i read this comment on a post by viajero (amit vijay).. check out the comment by abhi..

http://questbeyondeternity.blogspot.com/

if this goes on in the global market, nevertheless, its going to be impossible for the govt to insulate the consumer completely..this was apparently manmohan singhs explanation too..and i wont go against that..only that thers probably a lot of overheads in between that goes into increasing the market price for consumers.. this is wat the govt shud reduce..

dont forget to read the comment..

Manusmad said...

You know we pretty much have the same opinion about everything :)

Anyway, I am aware of the customs taxes and how reducing them would put off some of the load on the consumer. The reason given by the PM was that this would hurt the developmental activities in the country. While this may be true to a large extent, more efficient use of resources and thereby unburdening the common man should always be the primary concern.

Another thing that I forgot to mention in the original post is the price of Kerosene. This fuel, which is still the life-blood of the underprivileged population, has not been touched by the hike, even though rising crude prices will affect all refined products equally. This gesture must be appreciated. Also, the lowering of taxes by individual states have helped reduce some of the hike, the figure being Rs. 1.22 in Kerala for Petrol.

My whole point was, the Govt. must have been pushed to the brink in order to have taken such a drastic step so close to the next General Elections.

Wetfingers said...

Do you want to hear an insiders view point..i've got the facts, all of them.